(Answer) NR 716-Assignment week 4-Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
5 PAGES (Remember the PICOT you corrected)
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to develop a synthesis of evidence using three quantitative research articles and three non-research evidence sources. The development of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool builds a body of research evidence about a practice problem and evidence-based intervention for implementation in a practice change project. Continually adding research studies to the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool builds the foundation for the synthesis of research evidence for a practice change.
Please note that this is the first part of a 2-part assignment. You will receive feedback from your course faculty on this assignment and will be required to use the feedback to revise this paper. In Week 6, you will add to this paper and submit as the Week 6 Assignment.
Instructions
Follow these guidelines when completing the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have any questions.
- Review the directions for completing each column of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool(located in the Week 2 lesson).
- Use the two quantitative research studies from NR715 that are already on your expanding Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Add the quantitative research study appraised in Week 1 of this course to your Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. All articles must be recent research articles less than 5 years old, and be related to your selected National Practice Problem. Two of the quantitative research studies support your introduction and analysis of the selected practice problem. The quantitative study appraised in NR716 has tested the evidence-based intervention.
- If any of your quantitative research studies do not meet these requirements, you need to find replacement quantitative research studies and update the Johns Hopkins Evidence Summary Tool after you appraise, level the evidence, and grade the quality of the replacement study or studies.
- Locate three non-research evidence sources to support the introduction and analysis of the practice problem.
- Use a synthesis style of writing in every section (1, 2, 3, & 4) of the paper when incorporating research evidence and non-research evidence.
- Use the most current version of Microsoft Word, which is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing. You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in “docx.”
- All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.
- Review the rubric for the grading criteria.
The assignment includes the following components:
- Introduction (1-2 paragraphs, cited)
- Use the title of your paper for the header above the introduction section.
- Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
- Write a one-sentence purpose statement.
- Introduce the practice problem.
- Introduce an evidence-based intervention using research evidence to support the intervention.
- Analysis of the Practice Problem (1-2 paragraphs, cited)
- Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
- Present the following at the national and local levels:
- Significance
- Prevalence
- Mortality
- Economic ramifications of the practice problem
- Evidence Synthesis (minimum of 3 quantitative research articles; 2-3 paragraphs)
- Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
- Identify the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of research evidence (cited).
- Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence (cited).
- Present an objective overarching synthesis of the research intervention (cited).
- This synthesis must be a summary of the merged themes and findings of the two articles and cannot be a review of each article separately.
- Conclusion (1 paragraph, cited)
- Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
- Write one concise paragraph providing a clear and logical summation of the paper.
- References
- Include a list of all references in APA format.
- Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool Requirements:
- Includes the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool with the assignment. Do not embed the document in the paper.
- Includes a minimum of two quantitative research studies and one quantitative randomized control trial/quasi-experimental study.
- Complete all columns entirely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence accurately.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 4-6 pages (not including title page, reference page, or appendix)
- 1-inch margins
- Double-spaced pages
- 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
- Level 1 Headings
- In-text citations
- Title page
- Reference page
- Standard English usage and mechanics
Program Competencies
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Analyze research and non-research data for the purposes of critical appraisal and judgment of evidence for translation into practice. (PCs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 5, 7, 9)
- Synthesize high-level research and non-research evidence relevant to practice problems. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 5, 9)
Rubric
W4 – Evidence Synthesis Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Introduction
Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper. 2. Write a one-sentence purpose statement. 3. Introduce the practice problem. 4. Introduce the evidence-based intervention using research evidence. |
20 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction
18 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides a sufficient introduction
16 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial introduction
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped introduction
|
20 pts
|
|
Analysis of the Practice Problem
Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper. 2. Present the following at the national and local levels: a. Significance b. Prevalence c. Mortality d. Economic ramifications of the practice problem |
30 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and an provides an in-depth analysis of the practice problem
27 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides a sufficient analysis of the practice problem
24 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial analysis of the practice problem
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped analysis of the practice problem
|
30 pts
|
|
Evidence Synthesis
Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper. 2. Identify the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of research evidence. 3. Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence. 4. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research evidence about the intervention. 5. This synthesis must be a summary of the merged themes and findings of the two articles and cannot be a review of each article separately. |
60 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides an in-depth evidence synthesis
54 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides a sufficient evidence synthesis
48 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial evidence synthesis
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped evidence synthesis
|
60 pts
|
|
Conclusion
Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper. 2. Write one concise paragraph providing a clear and logical summation of the paper. |
10 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides an in-depth conclusion.
9 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides a sufficient conclusion
8 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial conclusion
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceProvides an undeveloped conclusion
|
10 pts
|
|
APA Style and Standards
Requirements:
1. Use appropriate Level I headers. 2. References and in-text citations are in current APA style. 3. Paper length is 4-6 pages excluding title, reference pages, and appendix. |
20 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and presents excellent APA style and standards
18 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides a very good APA style and standards
16 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic APA style and standards
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides poor style and standards
|
20 pts
|
|
Clarity of Writing
Requirements:
1. Standard English usage and mechanics 2. No spelling or typographical errors 3. Organized presentation of ideas |
20 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing
18 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing
16 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing
|
20 pts
|
|
Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Requirements:
1. Includes a minimum of two quantitative research studies and one quantitative randomized control trial/quasi-experimental study. 2. Complete all columns entirely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence accurately. 3. Includes the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool with the assignment. |
40 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides an in-depth summary table. Includes the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool.
36 ptsVery Good or High Level of PerformanceIncludes all requirements and provides a sufficient summary table. Includes the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool.
32 ptsAcceptable Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial summary table
0 ptsFailing Level of PerformanceIncludes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped completed summary table
|
40 pts
|
Total Points: 200
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.