This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing
|
25 to >22.5 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
22.5 to >20.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
20 to >17.5 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
17.5 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework
|
25 to >22.5 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
22.5 to >20.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
20 to >17.5 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
17.5 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice
|
25 to >22.5 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
22.5 to >20.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
20 to >17.5 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
17.5 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice
|
25 to >22.5 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
22.5 to >20.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
20 to >17.5 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.
|
17.5 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
|
7 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
7 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
7 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Total Points: 130
|
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.