(Answers) – NURS 3021c :Assessment 1 – Week 2:Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
exploratory Assignment: health and Wellness Scenario
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources presented in the module.
- Consider self-care behaviors that may promote wellness and resiliency.
- Reflect on how to manage conflict between personal and professional responsibilities while promoting self-care.
- Think about situations in your life and how you might apply self-care behaviors into practice.
- Download the handout: Health and Wellness Scenario Worksheet (Word) Download Health and Wellness Scenario Worksheet (Word)
The Assignment
View the video simulations and respond to the five questions in the Health and Wellness Scenario Worksheet.
Provide at least one basic reference and citation. The citation should include the author and date of publication, and the reference should include the author’s name, year, and source title per APA 7th formatting. As the course progresses, you’ll learn specific APA formatting and citation rules in detail.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn1_LastName_
FirstInitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Identifies and explains the impact of three time management and/or organizational strategies
|
8 to >6.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly identifies and explains three practices/strategies. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
6 to >5.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response identifies and explains three practices/strategies. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the explanation.
5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies and explains three practices/strategies, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing
|
8 pts
|
|
Describes how to communicate boundaries
|
8 to >6.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly describes communicating boundaries. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
6 to >5.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response describes communicating boundaries. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response describes communicating boundaries. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
|
8 pts
|
|
Explains impact of moral distress
|
8 to >6.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly explains the impact of moral distress. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
6 to >5.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response explains the impact of moral distress. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the explanation.
5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the impact of moral distress, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
|
8 pts
|
|
Explains two strategies and/or self-care practices
|
8 to >6.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly explains two strategies/self-care practices. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
6 to >5.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response explains two strategies/self-care practices. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely explains two strategies/self-care practices, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
|
8 pts
|
|
Discusses three options and/or resources for students to deal with “demands”
|
8 to >6.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly discusses three options/resources to deal with student demands. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the discussion.
6 to >5.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response discusses three options/resources to deal with student demands. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the discussion.
5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely discusses three options/resources to deal with student demands, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the discussion, or it is missing.
|
8 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Context, organization, audience, purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
|
5 to >3.5 pts Masters Expectations Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts Achieves Expectations Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
|
5 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Originality, source credibility, and attribution of ideas
|
5 to >3.5 pts Masters Expectations Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
3.5 to >3.0 pts Achieves Expectations Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
|
5 pts
|


Reviews
There are no reviews yet.