(Answers) – NURS 3021c :Assessment 1 – Week 4: Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
Exploratory Assignment: Implicit Bias Reflection
Everyone holds some sort of bias. While we may or may not realize, bias often occurs without an explicit understanding or reasoning. Whether from media, background, environment, relationships, etc., we each harbor some bias. As a result, it is important to consider and understand our bias to help eliminate any negative impact or implications.
In this Assignment, you will explore your own personal bias and reflect on your findings.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
- Explore your own bias by completing the Implicit Bias SurveyLinks to an external site.
- Consider what the results of the survey indicate about your understanding of bias and the possible implications for your practice
- Review the specific components of the Survey to Assess BiasLinks to an external site., paying particular attention to the sections: Characteristics of Implicit Bias, Identifying Implicit Bias in Healthcare Settings, and Identifying Implicit Bias in Yourself.
The Assignment (1 page)
Complete a 1-page journal in which you reflect on what you learned from the implicit bias survey. How might this bias impact your decision making?
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper (available at https://academicguides.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn1_LastName_
FirstInitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Reflected on what you learned from the implicit bias survey
|
20 to >15.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on learning that occurred from completing the implicit bias survey. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
15 to >12.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response reflects on learning that occurred from completing the implicit bias survey. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
12 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on learning that occurred from completing the implicit bias survey, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Reflect on how bias impacts decision making.
|
20 to >15.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on how bias impacts decision making. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
15 to >12.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response reflects on how bias impacts decision making. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
12 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on how bias impacts decision making, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Context, organization, audience, purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
|
5 to >3.5 pts Masters Expectations Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts Achieves Expectations Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
|
5 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Originality, source credibility, and attribution of ideas
|
5 to >3.5 pts Masters Expectations Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
3.5 to >3.0 pts Achieves Expectations Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
|
5 pts
|
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.