(Answers) – NURS 3021c :Assessment 2 – Week 4: Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
Bias Scenario
How can you recognize your own bias? How might you recognize bias in others?
Everyone has bias, and bias can occur in a variety of settings, even in professional and healthcare settings. This Assignment will allow you to listen to a scenario and practice identifying the bias you hear. You will also explore why it is important to recognize this bias and what can be done about it.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources for this module.
- Listen to the Bias Scenario audio clip in the Learning Resources.
- Consider the bias, social determinants of health, and quality care (or lack thereof) presented in each of the scenarios.
- Reflect on the importance of addressing bias and social determinants of health in providing quality patient care.
- Download the Bias Scenario handout Download Bias Scenario handout.
- Provide at least one in-text citation and a corresponding reference in APA format.
The Assignment
View the video simulations and respond to the four questions in the Bias Scenario handout.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn2_LastName_
FirstInitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_3021_Module4_Assignment2_
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Identified bias(es) presented in the scenario
|
20 to >15.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the bias in the given scenario. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
15 to >12.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response identifies the bias in the given scenario. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification.
12 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the bias in the given scenario, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support identification, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Reflected on why bias might exist in the population represented in the scenario
|
20 to >15.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on bias in the given population. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
15 to >12.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response reflects on bias in the given population. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
12 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on bias in the given population, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Explains the connection to social determinants of health and quality care
|
20 to >15.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly explains the connection to social determinants of health and quality care. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
15 to >12.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response explains the connection to social determinants of health and quality care. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the explanation.
12 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the connection to social determinants of health and quality care, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Identifies useful strategies for the scenario and given population
|
20 to >15.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly identifies useful strategies. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
15 to >12.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response identifies strategies. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification.
12 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies strategies, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support identification, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Context, organization, audience, purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
|
10 to >7.33 pts Masters Expectations Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
7.33 to >6.0 pts Achieves Expectations Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
6 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
|
10 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Originality, source credibility, and attribution of ideas
|
10 to >7.33 pts Masters Expectations Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
7.33 to >6.0 pts Achieves Expectations Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
6 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
|
10 pts
|
Total Points: 100
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.