(Answers)-MBAX 6000- Assessment – Week 3 -Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
An Evaluation of Leadership for House, Hearth and Home – Part 2
Last week, you completed a business report for the owner/GM of House, Hearth and Home in which you evaluated the leadership approach you felt was more effective for the company’s situation, including the rationale for your selection.
For this week’s Assignment, you will complete your evaluation of House, Hearth and Home by providing to the company owner/GM your recommendations on how he should address the situation. These recommendations are to be presented in the form of a business memo. Be sure to provide specific examples from the case and relevant citations from the Learning Resources, the library, and/or other credible, appropriate academic sources to substantiate and validate your position.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare for this Assignment:
- Read and review the case study House, Hearth and Home: Managing Leadership Change.
- Download the Week 3 Assignment Template (Word document) Download Week 3 Assignment Template (Word document).
By Day 7
Submit Part 2 of your evaluation of leadership for House, Hearth and Home by addressing the following in the form of a 1.5- to 3-page business memo (excluding references):
- Based on your evaluation of the situation and considering your assessment of which leadership approach is more effective for this company’s situation, make at least three recommendations for changes that Mr. Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
- As part of your recommendations, include any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making each of the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
Refer to the Week 3 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn_LastName_
Firstinitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Element 1: Recommendations for Addressing Leadership Concerns
|
30 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed proposal of more than three recommendations for changes that Mr. Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
27.9 Pts93%Student provides a detailed proposal of at least three recommendations for changes that Mr. Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
25.5 Pts85%Student provides a proposal of at least three recommendations for changes that Mr. Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
22.5 Pts75%Student provides a cursory proposal of at least three recommendations for changes that Mr. Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
30 pts
|
|
Element 2: Change and Risk
|
30 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed assessment of any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
27.9 Pts93%Student provides a detailed assessment of any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
25.5 Pts85%Student provides an assessment of any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
22.5 Pts75%Student provides a cursory assessment of any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
30 pts
|
|
Element 3a: Professional Writing: Presentation of Content
|
7.5 Pts100%Student’s writing is clear, logical, and well organized. Writing is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context.
6.98 Pts93%Student’s writing is mostly clear, logical, and well organized. Writing is mostly free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context. There are one or two minor errors.
6.38 Pts85%Student’s writing has some spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They use appropriate sentence and paragraph structure but sometimes present content in a manner that is not clear, logical, or well-organized.
5.63 Pts75%Student’s writing contains many spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They do not use, or inconsistently use, appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. The content lacks clarity, logic, and organization.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
7.5 pts
|
|
Element 3b: Professional Writing: Source Credibility & Attribution of Ideas
|
7.5 Pts100%Student’s writing demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are no errors in formatting and no missing source attributions or references.
6.98 Pts93%Student’s writing mostly demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.
6.38 Pts85%Student’s writing demonstrates some adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are several errors.
5.63 Pts75%Student’s writing demonstrates little adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
7.5 pts
|
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.