(Answers)-MBAX 6000- Discussion – Week 2 -Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
Considering Leadership Frameworks
For this Discussion, imagine the following scenario:
You are part of a team at the organization where you are currently employed (or at an organization with which you are familiar). This team is made up of members of the different departments at the organization. The executive director has tasked each member of the team to independently assess the following two questions:
- What theory of leadership most closely aligns with our current practice within our organization, and do you think it is most appropriate, or would another serve us better?
- What leadership theory would you recommend that might be more effective, and why? (Note: If you think the current leadership theory is a good fit and is effective, explain why you think it is working and should remain in place.)
You cannot believe your luck. The very week that you are given this task happens to be the very same week that leadership theory and frameworks are being discussed in the first class of your master’s program at Walden.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare for this Discussion:
- Review the leadership theories and frameworks presented in this week’s Learning Resources.
- Then, think about your current organization (or one with which you are familiar) in light of the leadership theories/frameworks you have examined in this course so far. In particular, consider the leadership of that organization and whether it seems to align with a particular leadership framework/theory. If it does not (or if you think the organization could use a change in approach), consider which theory/framework might be the best fit for that organization.
By Day 3
Post an evaluation of the leadership approach of your selected organization, to include the following:
- Assess the leadership theory/framework that you believe aligns with the organization in question. Or, if your organization does not seem to follow a particular approach (or you feel that changes are needed), assess what would be the most appropriate theory/framework for your organization based on what you now understand about leadership theory.
- As part of your assessment, paraphrase the central idea of the leadership theory/framework you have selected.
- Provide a rationale to support your selection of the leadership theory/framework for the organization, including relevant, appropriate examples and details (without identifying the organization or any individuals), as well as specific lessons that can be learned from the theory based on your observations and experiences.
Refer to the Week 2 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.
Read some of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 5
Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ posts in one or more of the following ways:
- Share an insight you gained from your colleague’s description of why they chose the particular leadership theory/framework for their organization.
- Offer an alternative perspective on what lessons could be learned from the theory your colleague discussed, including why your observations and experiences might prompt a different point of view.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.
MBAX_6000_Week_2_Discussion_
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Element 1a: Initial Post—Aligning Leadership Theories/Frameworks
|
7.5 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed assessment of the leadership theory/framework that they feel aligns with or would be the most appropriate for their selected organization, including a paraphrasing of the central idea of that leadership theory/framework.
6.98 Pts93%Student provides a detailed assessment of the leadership theory/framework that they feel aligns with or would be the most appropriate for their selected organization, including a paraphrasing of the central idea of that leadership theory/framework.
6.38 Pts85%Student provides an assessment of the leadership theory/framework that they feel aligns with or would be the most appropriate for their selected organization, including a paraphrasing of the central idea of that leadership theory/framework.
5.63 Pts75%Student provides a cursory assessment of the leadership theory/framework that they feel aligns with or would be the most appropriate for their selected organization, including a paraphrasing of the central idea of that leadership theory/framework.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
7.5 pts
|
|
Element 1b: Initial Post—Lessons Learned from Leadership Theories/Frameworks
|
8 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed rationale to support their selection of the leadership theory/framework for their selected organization, including specific lessons that can be learned from the theory based on their observations and experiences. Student includes relevant, appropriate examples and details.
7.44 Pts93%Student provides a detailed rationale to support their selection of the leadership theory/framework for their selected organization, including specific lessons that can be learned from the theory based on their observations and experiences. Student includes relevant, appropriate examples and details.
6.8 Pts85%Student provides a rationale to support their selection of the leadership theory/framework for their selected organization, including specific lessons that can be learned from the theory based on their observations and experiences. Student includes some examples and details.
6 Pts75%Student provides a cursory rationale to support their selection of the leadership theory/framework for their selected organization, including specific lessons that can be learned from the theory based on their observations and experiences. Student includes few if any examples and details.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
8 pts
|
|
Element 2a: Initial Post—Professional Writing: Presentation of Content
|
3.5 Pts100%Student’s initial post is clear, logical, and well-organized. Writing is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context.
3.26 Pts93%Student’s initial post is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized. Writing is mostly free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context. There are one or two minor errors.
2.98 Pts85%Student’s initial post has some spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They use appropriate sentence and paragraph structure but sometimes present content in a manner that is not clear, logical, or well-organized.
2.63 Pts75%Student’s initial post contains many spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They do not use, or inconsistently use, appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. The content lacks clarity, logic, and organization.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
3.5 pts
|
|
Element 2b: Initial Post—Professional Writing: Source Credibility & Attribution of Ideas
|
2 Pts100%Student’s initial post demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are no errors in formatting and no missing source attributions or references.
1.86 Pts93%Student’s initial post mostly demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.
1.7 Pts85%Student’s initial post demonstrates some adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are several errors.
1.5 Pts75%Student’s initial post demonstrates little adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
2 pts
|
|
Element 3: Engagement
|
14 Pts100%Student demonstrates substantive engagement in the Discussion forum by frequently participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds thoughtfully and thoroughly to at least two different colleagues, and their responses expand the depth or breadth of discussion on the topic at hand.
13.04 Pts93%Student demonstrates active engagement in the Discussion forum by participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds thoughtfully to at least two different colleagues, and their responses maintain the logical flow of the discussion on the topic at hand.
11.92 Pts85%Student demonstrates engagement in the Discussion forum by participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds to at least two different colleagues, and their responses maintain some logical flow of the discussion on the topic at hand.
10.48 Pts75%Student demonstrates some engagement in the Discussion forum by cursorily participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds to fewer than two different colleagues and/or their responses do not maintain the logical flow of the discussion on the topic at hand.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
14 pts
|
Total points: 35
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.