(Answers)-MBAX 6000- Discussion – Week 4 -Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
The Leader I Am or Aspire to Be—A Self-Reflection
For this Discussion, you are asked to review the subject matter of the past 3 weeks on leadership theories and frameworks and apply these to yourself using the process of self-reflection.
To prepare for this Discussion:
- You should first engage in reflection. Self-reflection is an important skill in business, especially for a leader or an aspiring leader. There are a number of different models of reflection that can be utilized; however, one of the more commonly used models is the 5R Framework for Reflection (Bain, et al., 2002), which focuses on five defined stages of reflection: reporting, responding, relating, reasoning, and reconstructing. Using this framework will enable you to produce a critically engaging reflection based on your experiences. Refer to the following table for more information about the framework:
| 5R Stages | Description | Guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting | A brief descriptive account of the situation/topic | What happened, what the situation/topic is |
| Responding | Your emotional/personal response to the situation/topic | Your observations, feelings, questions about the situation/topic |
| Relating | Personal and theoretical understandings relevant to the situation/topic | Making the connections between the situation/topic and your experience, skills, knowledge, and understanding |
| Reasoning | Your explanation of the situation/topic | Explaining the situation/topic in terms of the significant factors, relevant theories, and experiences |
| Reconstruction | Drawing conclusions and developing a future actionable plan | Your deeper level of understanding about the situation/topic that is used to reframe or reconstruct your future practice and further develop your understanding of professional practice (application) |
The 5R Framework of Self-Reflection
Adapted from: Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Post Pressed.
By Day 3
Post a summary of your leadership self-reflection, being sure to respond to the following:
- What is your leadership style and/or what kind of leader do you aspire to be? (Be sure to substantiate this through the Learning Resources.)
- Why do you lead in the way you do?
- How do you want others to see you?
Refer to the Week 4 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.
Read some of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 5
Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ posts in one or more of the following ways:
- Describe an insight you gained from reading the self-reflection your colleague posted.
- Compare how the reflection your colleague posted relates to yours and/or to the concepts discussed throughout the course to date.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.
MBAX_6000_Week_4_Discussion_
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Element 1a: Initial Post—Leadership Style
|
5 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed description of their leadership style and of the type of leader they aspire to become. Student provides strong, relevant examples to support their discussion.
4.65 Pts93%Student provides a detailed description of their leadership style and of the type of leader they aspire to become. Student provides relevant examples support their discussion.
4.25 Pts85%Student provides a description of their leadership style and of the type of leader they aspire to become. Student provides some examples to support their discussion.
3.75 Pts75%Student provides a cursory description of their leadership style and of the type of leader they aspire to become. Student provides vague or no examples to support their discussion.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
5 pts
|
|
Element 1b: Initial Post—Reasons for Leading
|
4 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed analysis of why they lead the way they do and how they wish others to see them as leaders. Student provides strong, relevant examples to support their analysis.
3.72 Pts93%Student provides a detailed analysis of why they lead the way they do and how they wish others to see them as leaders. Student provides relevant examples to support their analysis.
3.4 Pts85%Student provides an analysis of why they lead the way they do and how they wish others to see them as leaders. Student provides some examples to support their analysis.
3 Pts75%Student provides a cursory analysis of why they lead the way they do and how they wish others to see them as leaders. Student provides vague or no examples to support their analysis.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
4 pts
|
|
Element 2a: Initial Post—Professional Writing: Presentation of Content
|
2 Pts100%Student’s initial post is clear, logical, and well-organized. Writing is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context.
1.86 Pts93%Student’s initial post is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized. Writing is mostly free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context. There are one or two minor errors.
1.7 Pts85%Student’s initial post has some spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They use appropriate sentence and paragraph structure but sometimes present content in a manner that is not clear, logical, or well-organized.
1.5 Pts75%Student’s initial post contains many spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They do not use, or inconsistently use, appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. The content lacks clarity, logic, and organization.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
2 pts
|
|
Element 2b: Initial Post—Professional Writing: Source Credibility & Attribution of Ideas
|
1 Pts100%Student’s initial post demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are no errors in formatting and no missing source attributions or references.
0.93 Pts93%Student’s initial post mostly demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.
0.85 Pts85%Student’s initial post demonstrates some adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are several errors.
0.75 Pts75%Student’s initial post demonstrates little adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
1 pts
|
|
Element 3: Engagement
|
8 Pts100%Student demonstrates substantive engagement in the Discussion forum by frequently participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds thoughtfully and thoroughly to at least two different colleagues, and their responses expand the depth or breadth of discussion on the topic at hand.
7.45 Pts93%Student demonstrates active engagement in the Discussion forum by participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds thoughtfully to at least two different colleagues, and their responses maintain the logical flow of the discussion on the topic at hand.
6.81 Pts85%Student demonstrates engagement in the Discussion forum by participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds to at least two different colleagues, and their responses maintain some logical flow of the discussion on the topic at hand.
5.99 Pts75%Student demonstrates some engagement in the Discussion forum by cursorily participating in the ongoing dialogue with colleagues and Instructor throughout the week. Student responds to fewer than two different colleagues and/or their responses do not maintain the logical flow of the discussion on the topic at hand.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
8 pts
|
Total points: 20
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.