(Answers)-NURS-6512N- Assignment 2: Module 1-Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
Uses at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old.
Simulation Case Study #1: Obtaining a Comprehensive Health History
Obtaining an accurate and comprehensive health history is a foundational competency in advanced clinical practice. Research consistently demonstrates that a significant part of diagnoses can be accurately identified based on history alone. Beyond identifying symptoms, a comprehensive health history integrates biological, psychological, social, cultural, and environmental factors that influence health outcomes.
Level 1: No AI Permitted
- AI tools may not be used at any stage
- Common for clinical documentation or performance‑based work
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
To prepare:
- Download the Week 2 Case Study Assignment Template Download Week 2 Case Study Assignment Template.
- Download and review the Comprehensive Health History Reference Sheet Download Comprehensive Health History Reference Sheet.
- Access Simulation Case Study #1: Obtaining a Comprehensive Health HistoryLinks to an external site..
Part I: Obtaining and Documenting a Comprehensive Health History
Part II: Reflection
This reflection is designed to strengthen clinical reasoning by evaluating your interviewing process and identifying opportunities to enhance assessment quality.
After completing your comprehensive health history, submit a 1-page reflection addressing the questions listed in the assignment template.
By Sunday of Week 2
Submit the Assignment.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD1Assgn2_LastName_
FirstInitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment2_
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Part I: Obtaining and Documenting a Comprehensive Health History… Demonstrates accurate and complete documentation of patient history containing only subjective data. Includes a focused (not comprehensive) review of systems.
|
50 to >44.7 ptsExcellentProvides accurate and complete documentation of patient health history containing subjective data and a focused review of systems.
44.7 to >39.7 ptsGoodProvides a mostly accurate and complete documentation of patient health history containing subjective data and a focused review of systems.
39.7 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide documentation of patient health history; documentation is inaccurate and/or incomplete.
|
50 pts
|
|
Part II, Section 1: Additional Questions… Identify 3–5 questions you would ask the patient to further strengthen your assessment. Make sure at least one question relates to social determinants of health.
|
20 to >17.88 ptsExcellentIdentifies 3–5 questions they would ask the patient to further strengthen their assessment. At least one question relates to social determinants of health
17.88 to >15.88 ptsGoodIdentifies 3–5 questions they would ask the patient to further strengthen their assessment. None of the questions relates to social determinants of health.
15.88 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not identify 3–5 questions they would ask the patient; questions provided are unclear or incomplete.
|
20 pts
|
|
Part II, Section 2: Professional Growth… Identify one area where you would improve your interviewing skills based on this case. Briefly explain how you plan to strengthen that area.
|
15 to >13.41 ptsExcellentIdentifies one area of professional growth related to interviewing skills. Provides fully developed explanations of how they plan to strengthen their interviewing skills.
13.41 to >11.91 ptsGoodIdentifies one area of professional growth related to interviewing skills. Provides adequately developed explanations of how they plan to strengthen their interviewing skills.
11.91 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not identify one area of professional growth related to interviewing skills; explanation of how they plan to strengthen their interviewing skills is vague, unclear, or incomplete.
|
15 pts
|
|
Uses at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old.
|
5 to >4.46 ptsExcellentUses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
4.46 to >3.96 ptsGoodUses 2 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
3.96 to >3.46 ptsFairUses 1 peer-reviewed scholarly source published within the last 5 years.
3.46 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources or sources used are older than 5 years.
|
5 pts
|
|
Source Attribution and APA Formatting
|
5 to >4.46 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors.
4.46 to >3.96 ptsGoodAll sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors.
3.96 to >3.46 ptsFairAll sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46 to >0 ptsPoorMissing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules.
|
5 pts
|
|
Grammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
|
5 to >4.46 ptsExcellentCorrect grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4.46 to >3.96 ptsGoodCorrect grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
3.96 to >3.46 ptsFairCorrect grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
3.46 to >0 ptsPoorFrequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
|
5 pts
|
Total Points: 100
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.