(Answers)-NSG 5320- Conflict Management Essay :Week 5-Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
When working with others, conflict is inevitable. While conflict can be very positive and drive innovation, it can also be destructive and infect organizational teams. This essay is designed to explore the concept of conflict management, understand its purpose, identify strategies to manage conflict and determine methods to evaluate the efficacy of the management style.
Objectives:
- Identify strategies that promote transparency using high reliability and just culture principles.
- Apply leadership skills and decision making in the provision of culturally responsive, high-quality nursing care, healthcare team coordination, and the oversight and accountability for care delivery and outcomes.
- Design and navigate organizational structures that support care delivery and achieve desired outcomes.
For the assignment, the student will:
- Use the template provided to discuss the following aspects of conflict management in a narrative format:
- Introduction
- Clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thought-provoking
- Clearly states and describes the main topic
- Previews the structure and content of the paper
- Conflict
- Definition of conflict
- Types of conflict
- Pros and cons of conflict
- Conflict Management
- Types of conflict management strategies
- Indications for each type of strategy
- Conclusion
- Reviews the main topics presented
- Clearly and effectively summarizes significant conclusions
- Include supporting references with in-text citations.
- Follow APA 7 writing guidelines for paper formatting and reference list creation
- Adhere to professional communication standards
- Introduction
Download the Conflict Management Essay template here.Download Download the Conflict Management Essay template here.
Rubric
Conflict Management Essay Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Introduction
|
10 to >8.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThe introduction clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thought-provoking. The introduction clearly states and describes the main topic and previews the structure and content of the paper.
8 to >6.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThe introduction states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence but it fails to be engaging. The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper.
6 to >4.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThe introduction does state the paper’s purpose but it is convoluted and not engaging. The introduction does not clearly state the topic or preview the structure and content of the paper.
4 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsIncomplete or unfocused purpose statement. There is no clear introduction of main topic and/or the structure of the paper is missing.
|
10 pts
|
|
Discussion of Conflict Management
Definition of conflict
Types of conflict Pros and cons of conflict Types of conflict management strategies Indications for each type of strategy |
70 to >62.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is an exemplary discussion of conflict management, including significance, purpose, indications, methods, and evaluation of outcomes. Significant reading and critical thinking are evident. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
62 to >56.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere is a good discussion of the pros and cons of conflict management. Reading and critical thinking are evident. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
56 to >50.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is a cursory discussion of conflict management. Critical thinking is limited. There is substantiation with only a limited number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
50 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere is a limited discussion of conflict management. There is no evidence of critical thinking. There is a lack of substantiation with professional references and/or there are uncited statements of fact.
|
70 pts
|
|
Conclusion
|
10 to >8.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThe conclusion reviews the main topics presented and clearly and effectively summarizes significant conclusions.
8 to >6.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThe conclusion reviews the main topics presented and summarizes significant conclusions.
6 to >4.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is either a summary OR a conclusion.
4 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere is neither a conclusion or summary.
|
10 pts
|
|
Communication in Writing
|
20 to >18.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. There are no more than 2 errors in punctuation, capitalization, or spelling. There are no errors in sentence structure or word usage. Paraphrasing is used effectively.
18 to >16.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are usually effective in enhancing organization. There are few (2-4) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are no more than 2 quotations.
16 to >15.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is logical organization but some ideas are not fully or consistently developed OR transitions are awkward at times although the flow is adequately maintained. There are several (5-8) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are more than 2 quotations.
15 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsAny of the following: there is no evidence of structure or organization; ideas are not fully developed; minimal use of transitions throughout the paper; there are >8 errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure, or word usage with significant impact on the content and detracts from the paper; there are more than 4 quotations.
|
20 pts
|
|
APA
• Title page
• Headings • Citations • Reference page • Font, layout, margins |
20 to >18.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is consistent adherence to APA criteria in title page, headings, citations, and/or reference page with no more than 2 APA errors. Font, layout, and/or margins adhere to APA format. There are no omitted citations. Any quotataions include page number. Secondary citations are avoided but, if necessary, are appropriately cited as such.
18 to >16.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere are few (<4) APA errors in title page, headings, citations, reference page, font, layout, and/or margins.
16 to >14.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere are several (<8) errors in title page, headings, citations, reference page, font, layout, and/or margins.
14 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere are major problems with implementation of APA in title page, headings, citations, and/or reference page. Font, layout, and/or margins do not adhere to APA format.
|
20 pts
|
|
References
|
20 to >18.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsMore than 5 references with at least 3 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov.
18 to >16.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsBetween 4-5 references with at least 2 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov.
16 to >15.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsBetween 3-4 references with 1 research references OR use of.com websites.
15 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsFewer than 3 research references and use of .com websites.
|
20 pts
|
Total points: 150
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.