(Answers)-NSG 5320- Discussion: Week 6-Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
Discussions play an integral role in monitoring your course participation throughout the term. You should check back to the weekly discussions multiple times throughout the week to engage in the discussion with your professor and peers. Participation is only counted during the week in which this discussion is assigned. Be sure to appropriately cite any sources you use to support your responses with standard APA citations. Answer the prompt question(s) thoroughly using a minimum of 150-200 words and respond to as many of your peers as possible – note that responses to 2 of your peers are required for full credit. Be sure to answer any additional questions asked by your professor in the discussion threads. Your initial post is due by Day 3 of the current week, and follow-up posts to your peers are due on Day 7!
- Initial Post due Day 3
- Responses due Day 7
Purpose:
The purpose of the threaded discussion is to promote dialogue among students and faculty related to course competencies and constructs to enhance mastery of knowledge related to course objectives.
Requirements:
- The student must provide the initial substantive response to the discussion question/topic(s) posted by the course faculty by Friday of those weeks with a discussion board assignment.
- The student must also provide a minimum of two additional responses to two student colleagues on two different days by Tuesday of those weeks with a discussion board assignment.
- All questions posed to the initial student post by course faculty need to be answered by the student to earn full credit for the discussion board assignment.
- This should be substantive feedback to a student colleague’s response to the question/topic posted by the course faculty. All responses must be respectful and thoughtful.
Discussion boards are not opinion boards. Students are expected to have scholarly sources to support their claims and constructs presented in the original post and citations must be provided. While scholarly resources are not required for your response posts, they do strengthen your posts and you must cite information taken from a source. Citations for parts of posts that are synthesized from the course text, peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. Course faculty monitor for the compliance of citations with Turnitin evaluation of the posts intermittently during the course session.
Discussion Prompt:
Complete the following case study.
The five characteristics of high-reliability organizations have assisted leaders in providing safer, more appropriate patient care services. In a recent situation, a team made the decision to replace existing blood glucose monitoring equipment in the outpatient, inpatient, surgical, and emergency departments with new equipment that was less costly and believed to be of higher quality in data management. Within two weeks, problems with accuracy and equipment failure were identified in the inpatient and surgical areas. Over 50 patients were identified to have received inappropriate insulin management.
- Consider the five principles of a high-reliability organization. Analyze this scenario in terms of the principles.
- Which principles were followed?
- What changes should be made to improve operations?
Note: This discussion requires you to complete your initial post before you can see your classmates’ posts. If you are having trouble getting started, please contact your instructor.
| NSG Online Discussion Board Rubric 12.22 rev (1) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Points |
|
Original Post
|
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
All supportive facts are reported accurately. The response demonstrates mastery of content and significant critical thinking related to the question. 8 pts
Meets Most Excpectations
Almost all supportive facts are reported accurately. The response shows knowledge of the content but limited critical thinking to the question. 6 pts
Meets some of the expectations
Some supportive facts are reported accurately. The response demonstrates limited knowledge of the content and no critical thinking related to the question 2 pts
Posts but does not meet expectations
No facts are reported OR are inaccurately reported. The response contains misinformation and/or inaccurate thinking related to the question. 0 pts
No post
No post by Friday |
/ 10 pts
|
|
Original Post
|
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Multiple (>2) references including professional journals and noncommercial (e.g., gov, edu, org) website. At least one peer-reviewed research article that is < than 5 years old is included in references. 4 pts
Meets Most Expectations
At least two references including professional journals and noncommercial (e.g., gov, edu, org) website. 3 pts
Meets some of the expectations
Only one reference including professional journals and noncommercial (e.g., gov, edu, org) website 2 pts
Posts but does not meet expectations
No professional references. Based solely on personal opinion or lay literature. 0 pts
No post
No evidence noted to support claims. |
/ 5 pts
|
|
Responses to Peers Demonstrate Knowledge, Accuracy of Facts and Evidence of Critical Thinking
|
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
All peer response posts demonstrate knowledge of the content and significant critical thinking related to the peer posts and faculty questions All responses demonstrate supportive facts are reported accurately 8 pts
Meets Most Expectations
Most of the peer response posts demonstrate knowledge of the content and significant critical thinking related to the peer posts and faculty questions. Most of responses demonstrate supportive facts are reported accurately 6 pts
Meets some of the expectations
Some of peer response posts demonstrate knowledge of the content and significant critical thinking related to the peer posts and faculty questions. Responses are missing some facts, and accuracy. 2 pts
Posts but does not meet expectations
Limited responses to peers with anecdotal opinions. No demonstration of critical thought or accuracy. 0 pts
No post
Response are a few words and do not add depth to discussion. |
/ 10 pts
|
|
Responses to faculty questions are thoughtful, and accurate, and demonstrate evidence of critical thinking.
|
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
All responses to faculty questions are thoughtful, substantive, complete responses with evidence of critical thought and resources offered to support claims when appropriate 4 pts
Meets Most Expectations
All responses to faculty questions are thoughtful, substantive, complete responses with evidence of critical thought and resources offered to support claims when appropriate 3 pts
Meets some of the expectations
Some response to faculty questions but do not address all questions, are brief and demonstrate minimal critical thought. 2 pts
Posts but does not meet expectations
Response posted before end of week, demonstrate minimal response to faculty questions. with no evidence of critical thinking or additional evidence offered 0 pts
No post
Responses are inaccurate and do not demonstrate critical thought. |
/ 5 pts
|
|
Responds to two peers on two different days by Tuesday at 11:59 pm ET.
|
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Responds to Two Peers. 0 pts
No post
Does not respond to two peers. |
/ 5 pts
|
|
Responds to all faculty questions.
|
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Responds to all faculty questions 0 pts
No Post
Does not respond to faculty questions |
/ 5 pts
|
|
Response Posts demonstrate Professional Writing Skills
|
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The posts are professionally written with no errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation 4 pts
Meets Most Expectations
The post has 1-2 errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation 3 pts
Meets some of the expectations
The post has 3-4 errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation 2 pts
Posts but does not meet expectations
The post has more than 4 errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation. 0 pts
No post
The post has greater than 4 errors. |
/ 5 pts
|
|
APA Formatting for intext citations and references
|
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
APA format is without error and aligns fully with current APA guidelines 4 pts
Meets Most Expectations
APA format has 1-2 errors with formatting. 3 pts
Meets some of the expectations
APA format has 3-4 errors with formatting. 2 pts
Posts but does not meet expectations
APA format has greater than 4 errors. 0 pts
No post
APA formatting is not used for citations. |
/ 5 pts
|
| Total points: 0 | ||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.