(Answers)-NSG 5320-Shared Governance Debate Essay: Week 3-Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
Shared governance has gained tremendous popularity among healthcare facilities due to its aim of including nurses in policy development surrounding the provision of patient care. But is it worth all the hype? This assignment will explore this highly regarded program’s positive and negative aspects from the clinical and leadership perspectives.
Objectives:
- Apply leadership skills and decision-making in providing culturally responsive, high-quality nursing care, healthcare team coordination, and oversight and accountability for care delivery and outcomes.
- Recognize the contributions of individuals and interprofessional healthcare teams to improve patient and population health outcomes.
- Advocate for the value and role of the professional nurse as a member and leader of interprofessional healthcare teams.
- Design and navigate organizational structures that support care delivery and achieve desired outcomes.
For the assignment, the student will:
- Use the template provided to discuss the following aspects of shared governance in a narrative format:
- Introduction
- Clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thought-provoking
- Clearly states and describes the main topic
- Previews the structure and content of the paper
- Staff Nurse Perspective
- Discusses the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective
- Nurse Leader Perspective
- Discusses the pros and cons of shared governance from a nurse leader’s perspective
- Conclusion
- Reviews the main topics presented
- Clearly and effectively summarizes significant conclusions
- Introduction
- Include supporting references with in-text citations.
- Follow APA 7 writing guidelines for paper formatting and reference list creation
- Adhere to professional communication standards
Download the Shared Governance Debate Essay Template here.Download Download the Shared Governance Debate Essay Template here.
Rubric
Shared Governance Essay Rubric (1)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Introduction
|
10 to >8.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThe introduction clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thought-provoking. The introduction clearly states and describes the main topic and previews the structure and content of the paper.
8 to >6.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThe introduction states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence but it fails to be engaging. The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper.
6 to >4.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThe introduction does state the paper’s purpose but it is convoluted and not engaging. The introduction does not clearly state the topic or preview the structure and content of the paper.
4 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsIncomplete or unfocused purpose statement. There is no clear introduction of main topic and/or the structure of the paper is missing.
|
10 pts
|
|
Staff Nurse Perspective
Discuss the pros and cons of shared governance from the staff nurse’s perspective
|
40 to >35.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is an exemplary discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective. Significant reading and critical thinking are evident. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
35 to >30.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere is a good discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective. Reading and critical thinking are evident. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
30 to >25.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is a cursory discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective are identified. Critical thinking is limited. There is substantiation with only a limited number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
25 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere is a limited discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective. There is no evidence of critical thinking. There is a lack of substantiation with professional references and/or there are uncited statements of fact.
|
40 pts
|
|
Nurse Leader Perspective
Discuss the pros and cons of shared governance from the nurse leader’s perspective
|
40 to >35.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is an exemplary discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective. Significant reading and critical thinking are evident. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
35 to >30.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere is a good discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective. Reading and critical thinking are evident. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
30 to >25.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is a cursory discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective are identified. Critical thinking is limited. There is substantiation with only a limited number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact.
25 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere is a limited discussion of the pros and cons of shared governance from a staff nurse’s perspective. There is no evidence of critical thinking. Thre is a lack of substantiation with professional references and/or there are uncited statements of fact.
|
40 pts
|
|
Conclusion
|
10 to >8.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThe conclusion reviews the main topics presented and clearly and effectively summarizes significant conclusions.
8 to >6.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThe conclusion reviews the main topics presented and summarizes significant conclusions.
6 to >4.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is either a summary OR a conclusion.
4 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere is neither a conclusion or summary.
|
10 pts
|
|
Communication in Writing
|
20 to >18.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. There are no more than 2 errors in punctuation, capitalization, or spelling. There are no errors in sentence structure or word usage. Paraphrasing is used effectively.
18 to >16.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are usually effective in enhancing organization. There are few (2-4) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are no more than 2 quotations.
16 to >15.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere is logical organization but some ideas are not fully or consistently developed OR transitions are awkward at times although the flow is adequately maintained. There are several (5-8) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are more than 2 quotations.
15 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsAny of the following: there is no evidence of structure or organization; ideas are not fully developed; minimal use of transitions throughout the paper; there are >8 errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure, or word usage with significant impact on the content and detracts from the paper; there are more than 4 quotations.
|
20 pts
|
|
APA
• Title page
• Headings • Citations • Reference page • Font, layout, margins |
10 to >9.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsThere is consistent adherence to APA criteria in title page, headings, citations, and/or reference page with no more than 2 APA errors. Font, layout, and/or margins adhere to APA format. There are no omitted citations. Any quotataions include page number. Secondary citations are avoided but, if necessary, are appropriately cited as such.
9 to >8.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsThere are few (<4) APA errors in title page, headings, citations, reference page, font, layout, and/or margins.
8 to >7.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsThere are several (<8) errors in title page, headings, citations, reference page, font, layout, and/or margins.
7 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsThere are major problems with implementation of APA in title page, headings, citations, and/or reference page. Font, layout, and/or margins do not adhere to APA format.
|
10 pts
|
|
References
|
20 to >18.0 PtsExceeds ExpectationsMore than 5 references with at least 3 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov.
18 to >16.0 PtsMeets ExpectationsBetween 4-5 references with at least 2 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov.
16 to >15.0 PtsBarely meets expectationsBetween 3-4 references with 1 research references OR use of.com websites.
15 to >0 PtsDoes not meet expectationsFewer than 3 research references and use of .com websites.
|
20 pts
|
Total points: 150
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.