(Answers)-MBAX 6000- Assessment – Week 2 -Online Nursing Assignment Help
Description
An Evaluation of Leadership for House, Hearth and Home – Part 1
Over the next 2 weeks, you will examine a case study that demonstrates the effectiveness of different leadership approaches of two individuals in a company and will provide to the business owner/general manager a report that details your observations and recommendations. This case provides an opportunity to evaluate and contrast different leadership styles and theories in a real-world context.
Scenario
The owner/general manager of House, Hearth and Home, a large retail hardware, furniture, and building center, is facing a dilemma regarding the leadership effectiveness of his long-time yard manager and that of a newly hired assistant manager. The owner has hired you as a consultant and has asked you to investigate and then report your findings and recommendations on how he should address this situation.
For this week’s Assignment, you will prepare a business report to the company owner/GM that addresses the leadership theory or framework that Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employ, the differences in their leadership style, along with a discussion on which approach you feel is more effective for this company’s situation and why. Be sure to provide specific examples from the case and relevant citations from the Learning Resources, the library, and/or other credible, appropriate academic sources to substantiate and validate your position. For more information about evaluating the credibility of sources for use in your coursework, please review the following video:
- Walden University, LLC. (2021). Evaluating the credibility of sources [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.
com Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 9 minutes.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare for this Assignment:
- Read and review the document How to Analyze a Business Case Study (PDF) Download How to Analyze a Business Case Study (PDF).
- Read and review the case study House, Hearth and Home: Managing Leadership Change.
- Download the Week 2 Assignment Template (Word document) Download Week 2 Assignment Template (Word document).
By Day 7
Submit Part 1 of your evaluation of leadership for House, Hearth and Home, in which you address the following in a 2- to 3-page business report (excluding references):
- Based on your case analysis, what leadership theory or framework do Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employ? Be sure to provide specific examples from the case and other academic sources to validate your position.
- What are the differences in leadership style for each of these individuals?
- Which approach do you feel is more effective for this company’s situation, and why? Include the pros and cons of each approach in your assessment.
Refer to the Week 2 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn_LastName_
Firstinitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Element 1: Leadership Theories From the Case Study
|
18.5 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed evaluation of what leadership theory or framework Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employed, including detailed, specific examples from the case and other academic sources to validate their position.
17.21 Pts93%Student provides a detailed evaluation of what leadership theory or framework Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employed, including specific examples from the case and other academic sources to validate their position.
15.73 Pts85%Student provides an evaluation of what leadership theory or framework Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employed, including some examples from the case and other academic sources to validate their position.
13.88 Pts75%Student provides a cursory evaluation of what leadership theory or framework Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employed, including vague examples from the case and other academic sources to validate their position.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
18.5 pts
|
|
Element 2: Differences in Leadership Style
|
18.5 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed evaluation of the differences in leadership style for each of the individuals in the case study.
17.21 Pts93%Student provides a detailed evaluation of the differences in leadership style for each of the individuals in the case study.
15.73 Pts85%Student provides an evaluation of the differences in leadership style for each of the individuals in the case study.
13.88 Pts75%Student provides a cursory evaluation of the differences in leadership style for each of the individuals in the case study.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
18.5 pts
|
|
Element 3: Effectiveness of Different Approaches
|
23 Pts100%Student provides a thorough and detailed assessment of which approach they feel is more effective for the company’s situation and why, including the pros and cons of each approach.
21.39 Pts93%Student provides a detailed assessment of which approach they feel is more effective for the company’s situation and why, including the pros and cons of each approach.
19.55 Pts85%Student provides an assessment of which approach they feel is more effective for the company’s situation and why, including the pros and cons of each approach.
17.25 Pts75%Student provides a cursory assessment of which approach they feel is more effective for the company’s situation and why, including the pros and cons of each approach.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
23 pts
|
|
Element 4a: Professional Writing: Presentation of Content
|
7.5 Pts100%Student’s writing is clear, logical, and well organized. Writing is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context.
6.98 Pts93%Student’s writing is mostly clear, logical, and well organized. Writing is mostly free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional, scholarly, and free from bias. Content presented reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing and a style consistent with the appropriate professional setting/workplace context. There are one or two minor errors.
6.38 Pts85%Student’s writing has some spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They use appropriate sentence and paragraph structure but sometimes present content in a manner that is not clear, logical, or well-organized.
5.63 Pts75%Student’s writing contains many spelling, punctuation, and/or syntax/grammar errors. They do not use, or inconsistently use, appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. The content lacks clarity, logic, and organization.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
7.5 pts
|
|
Element 4b: Professional Writing: Source Credibility & Attribution of Ideas
|
7.5 Pts100%Student’s writing demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are no errors in formatting and no missing source attributions or references.
6.98 Pts93%Student’s writing mostly demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.
6.38 Pts85%Student’s writing demonstrates some adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are several errors.
5.63 Pts75%Student’s writing demonstrates little adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
0 Pts0%Not submitted or little to no evidence of addressing the criterion.
|
7.5 pts
|
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.